11 °c
London
Wednesday, April 14, 2021
No Result
View All Result
FurtherAsia FurtherArabia FurtherBrazil FurtherRussia
FurtherAfrica
  • Countries
    • Angola
    • Botswana
    • Cape Verde
    • DRC
    • Eswatini
    • Ethiopia
    • Kenya
    • Malawi
    • Mauritius
    • Mozambique
    • Namibia
    • Nigeria
    • Rwanda
    • South Africa
    • Tanzania
    • Uganda
    • Zambia
    • Zimbabwe
  • OpenTalk
  • Understanding
  • Videos
  • Weekend
  • About
FurtherAfrica
  • Countries
    • Angola
    • Botswana
    • Cape Verde
    • DRC
    • Eswatini
    • Ethiopia
    • Kenya
    • Malawi
    • Mauritius
    • Mozambique
    • Namibia
    • Nigeria
    • Rwanda
    • South Africa
    • Tanzania
    • Uganda
    • Zambia
    • Zimbabwe
  • OpenTalk
  • Understanding
  • Videos
  • Weekend
  • About
No Result
View All Result
FurtherAfrica
No Result
View All Result
Home Africa

African miners accepting one-time payments to settle disputes worries investors

FurtherAfrica by FurtherAfrica
June 29, 2018
in Africa, DRC, Legislation, Mining, Tanzania, Tax
Reading Time: 3 mins read
0
Opinion: Africa needs to extract more value from mining
Share via QRWhatsappShare on FacebookShare on TwitterLinkedInPinteresteMail

Miners across Africa are increasingly using one-time payments to settle disputes with governments, a trend that’s disturbing some investors.

A $150m payment by Glencore’s Katanga Mining to the Democratic Republic of Congo’s (DRC) Gecamines earlier this month followed Freeport McMoRan’s separate $100m settlement with the state-owned company in January 2017.

Last October, Barrick Gold proposed paying Tanzania $300m as part of efforts to negotiate a settlement for its majority-owned Acacia Mining.

The shift, identified by the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative — which promotes good governance in the mining industry — comes as African nations seek redress from old contracts often perceived to favour international miners.

While there’s no suggestion such settlements breach any rules, some investors are concerned that certain payments are poorly defined and fall at the boundaries of existing regulations.

“We are nervous about bespoke deals,” said Nick Stansbury, a fund manager at Legal & General Investment Management in London. “If a company is having to negotiate a number of one-off settlements with governments, that might be indicative they are operating at the very margins of what is permitted under a statutory framework. If so, that would raise genuine social licence to operate issues, which are first order financial risks.”

Redressing balance

On one hand, African governments are flexing their muscles and being more proactive in prosecuting companies that don’t comply with local laws. They are also being more effective at extracting penalties, particularly when rising commodity prices give them more negotiating power.

African governments are flexing their muscles and being more proactive in prosecuting companies that don’t comply with local laws. They are also being more effective at extracting penalties.

“There’s a sense that a lot of mining deals are unfair and that companies have not paid enough in taxes,” said Thomas Lassourd, an analyst at the New York-based Natural Resource Governance Institute, which advises governments on mining policy. “The need to make such payments is often seen as a fair way to address that.”

Of greater concern, is that some settlements lack transparency, raising concerns about how the funds will be disbursed.

If companies are going to make such payments, they need to show “they have appropriate checks and balances in place to avoid misappropriate uses”, said Christine Chow, a director at Hermes Investment Management. “Any financial settlement or payments, therefore, should tie to the expectations that local communities will, as a result, be able to benefit.”

Payments misused

In countries such as the DRC, weak governance means there’s a high risk that payments can be misused, according to Peter Jones, a campaign leader at Global Witness, a London-based advocacy group. “Gecamines has consistently mismanaged DRC’s mining revenues. It is vital that payments to the company are made with complete transparency.”

Gecamines declined to comment. Last November, the state-owned miner rejected claims from the Atlanta-based Carter Centre that nearly $750m paid by international mining companies is missing from its accounts. “All the revenues received by Gecamines over the relevant periods are faithfully transcribed into the accounts,” it said at the time.

The DRC was ranked 161st in Transparency International’s 2017 Corruption Perceptions Index, which surveyed 180 nations by their perceived levels of public-sector corruption. New Zealand was seen as the least corrupt and Somalia the most, ranking 180th. More than half the bottom 20 countries were in Africa.

Good faith

The payment earlier this month by Katanga Mining — 86% owned by Glencore — to Gecamines settled certain “historical commercial disputes”, the Swiss mining and commodities trading giant said. It was part of a wide-ranging settlement to lift the threat to billions of dollars’ worth of copper and cobalt assets it holds in the country.

Still, in a 5,000-word statement describing the mechanics of the agreement to end the legal proceedings with the state-owned miner, Katanga dedicated less than 150 words to the payment.

“The underlying basis of Glencore’s payment to Gecamines is unclear,” Jones said.

Quick fixes

Barrick chairman John Thornton agreed in October that his company’s 63.9%-owned Acacia Mining would pay $300m to the Tanzanian government in a “show of good faith” to end a dispute over exports and taxes. After gaining 16% on the day the proposed payment was announced, Acacia’s stock has since slumped 44% as a final settlement proves elusive.

Barrick declined to comment. The Toronto-based miner, this week, withdrew a timetable for resolving the spat with Tanzania’s government, after previously saying it would provide Acacia with a detailed proposal by the end of June. The $300m has yet to be paid.

Freeport McMoRan also declined to comment.

Payments that provide quick fixes for disputes can be risky, said Karina Litvack, the former head of governance and sustainable investment at F&C Asset Management, who warns that such deals should be as transparent as possible to limit the opportunities for funds to be misappropriated. “It can come back to bite companies who handle these things clumsily, and when that happens, it’s generally investors who have to pick up the tab.”

Source: BusinessDay

Related

Tags: ACACIA MiningBarrick GoldDemocratic Republic of CongoDRCExtractive Industries Transparency InitiativeFeatureFreeport McMoRanGecaminesGlencoreKatanga MiningTanzaniaтанзанияتنزانياタンザニア坦桑尼亚
ScanSendShare320Tweet200Share56Pin72Send
Previous Post

Botswana: Lucara Diamond plans underground mining at Korowe

Next Post

Zimbabwe commissions construction of Chinese-funded power plant

FurtherAfrica

FurtherAfrica

Founded in 2015 FurtherAfrica is an online platform centralising news and content focusing on the development and growth story of the African continent.

Related Posts

Business tourism benefits from new measures in Angola
Aviation

Embraer aircrafts have become key for Kenya Airways

by Staff
April 14, 2021
South African investment opening previously closed markets in Mozambique
Mozambique

South African investment opening previously closed markets in Mozambique

by Staff
April 14, 2021
Census of Companies in Angola funded by the World Bank
Legal

Angola: Fees to be charged by the Data Protection Agency

by Duarte Marques da Cruz
April 14, 2021
Farming

Zimbabwe: Tobacco farmers earn US$9M in 3 days

by Staff
April 14, 2021
Egypt seizes Suez canal ship ‘Ever Given’ pending US$916M compensation
Logistics

Egypt seizes Suez canal ship ‘Ever Given’ pending US$916M compensation

by Staff
April 14, 2021
Next Post
China, Zimbabwe agree to establish comprehensive strategic partnership

Zimbabwe commissions construction of Chinese-funded power plant

A blockchain tour of Africa

Crypto in Africa: Startup meshes with free mobile data, KryptoPal helps African kids

Zimbabwe’s coal output set to quadruple as investors arrive

Kibo, Termoeléctrica finalise Benga JV in Mozambique

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

2021 AFSIC
2022 Indaba Mining

FurtherAfrica Partners

The Exchange Club of Mozambique Taarifa Rwanda
CrudeMix Africa TechGist Africa Farmers Review Africa
Botswana unplugged Financial Insights Zambia Africa Oil & Power
Harambee Africa Novafrica  

Subscribe to FurtherAfrica

Enter your email address to receive notifications of new articles on your email.

Join 73,051 other subscribers.

FurtherAfrica

© 2021 FurtherMarkets

FurtherAfrica is a FurtherMarkets Limited platform

  • Countries
  • OpenTalk
  • Understanding
  • Videos
  • Weekend
  • About

Follow Us

No Result
View All Result
  • Countries
    • Angola
    • Botswana
    • Cape Verde
    • DRC
    • Eswatini
    • Ethiopia
    • Kenya
    • Malawi
    • Mauritius
    • Mozambique
    • Namibia
    • Nigeria
    • Rwanda
    • South Africa
    • Tanzania
    • Uganda
    • Zambia
    • Zimbabwe
  • OpenTalk
  • Understanding
  • Videos
  • Weekend
  • About

© 2021 FurtherMarkets

This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used. Visit our Privacy and Cookie Policy.
Are you sure want to unlock this post?
Unlock left : 0
Are you sure want to cancel subscription?